• stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    In the great words of Atlas Pro after going into excruciating detail on why no answer is more correct He said:

    So gow many continents are there?

    “Obviously six”

    No further clarification was given.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Australia and Oceania” here, in the first of two models I’ll elaborate on.

        We were taught two different models

        First one translates basically as “divisions of the world”

        • Europe
        • Asia
        • Africa
        • Antarctica
        • Australia and Oceania
        • Americas

        The other one translates more directly as “continents”

        • Eurasia
        • Africa
        • Antarctica
        • Australia
        • North America
        • South America

        But those are of course not the only models, just the ones taught in school where I’m from.

  • tea@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    3 days ago

    Europe being on a different continent than Asia always seemed like bullshit. I can forgive the isthmuses, but Eurasia feels like it’s a thing to me.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      But then you run into the issue that the very concept of continent was invented to differentiate Europe and Asia (and Africa).

      • tea@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eh, words change and sometimes terms outlive their etymology or grow beyond it. We “hang up the phone” but no phone these days is actually hung up. 🤷

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s literally the same thing, we kept the expression even when we know it isn’t accurate any more, because we still have the need to express the original meaning.

          If anything, we should split Asia in more subcontinents.

          • inari@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Informally, we kinda do. Middle East, East Asia, South East Asia, South Asia.

          • tea@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, fair enough.

            Still seems like, with the way that continent is typically defined, Eurasia should be the continent with subcontients of Europe, Asia, India, and the Middle East.

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well by that logic then Europe ,Asia and Africa are all one continent. Just because someone dug a fucking suez ditch does not make them any less connected.

      • tea@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Since continent doesn’t have a strict definition, in my book, giving the isthmus of suez (and the isthmus of panama) a pass makes sense. Both of those were historically very difficult to traverse and not viable sustained trade routes compared to just sailing around them. Hell, there’s still not a road that links North and South America through the Darian Gap, which is wild to me considering what seems like should be a vital connection point bottleneck.

        I understand “continent” a mercurial word and so people can define Europe and Asia as being different contients, but it does seem like it’s the only continental division that doesn’t make logical sense to me.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well I guess. But there is a bridge across the suez and by a similar kind of logic you could split europe into 2 ‘continets’ because of the donau-main kanal. Same thing as the panama one as far as I am concerned.

          • tea@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I think of it more as if you were to give a pen to an alien child and said “draw a circle around the main landmasses on this planet” they would probably logically draw circles around North America, South America, Eurasia, Africa, Australia, and Antarctica. They wouldn’t look at the Ural Mountains or any sort of canal systems, just “these are the main blobs on this world map.”

            But that’s just the way I think of continents. 🤷‍♂️

            • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I guess. But in my mind still main landmass would encompass anything connected to it. So if you were to look at the earth before we built all those canals there would be like 4 continents. I don’t personally think small things like a canal would be enough to actually separate 1 continent into 2. It would have to be quite a bit of distance for that to make sense. Like if the entire canal was the width and depth of the gulf of suez then yes, we have made a new continent.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Romans divided the world into three equal landmasses before they understood how it was actually laid out and it stuck.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Definitely not the Romans. It may have stuck because of them, but the Greeks divided the world that way long before Rome left Italy.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sometimes things are defined by history, inertia, earlier understandings. There are six continents, because there’s always been six and it would be overly pedantic to find objective criteria with today’s understanding …… unless you want another Pluto controversy.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Europe isn’t a continent, it’s a political entity. A continent is geographic. EurAsia is a continent.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol no. The european union is the political entity. Europe is a continent. Asia is a continent. If you want to talk about both of them together you can say eurasia but they are not one continent.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        What delineates Europe from Asia that shouldn’t also delineate India from Asia?

        Not trying to be argumentative, curious. I’ve always heard of India as a subcontinent, and when explained why it seems like Europe fits the same description.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are one continuous landmass. A continent is one continuous landmass. You can’t split a single landmass and call it two separate continents.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            There are going to be little isthmuses connecting landmasses, but that doesn’t make them combined. Africa is technically connected to both Europe and Asia, but nobody is suggesting that they be combined with Europe and Asia. Europe and Asia are literally the same landmass, with just a border between them.

            Even the Middle East probably has a better claim on being a Continent than Europe.

            Besides, the Panama Canal essentially makes North And South America separated by water.

            • fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Aren’t Europe and Asia on the same techtonic plate? Isn’t that also the reason India is considered a subcontinent because it is on a different techtonic plate?

              • mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Iceland is between two tectonic plates, and that rule would separate the Somali plate from the rest of Africa, make the Caribbean its own continent, etc

          • homura1650@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            North and South America are joined by a thin strip of land that serves as the continent border. Africa and Eurasia are joined by a thin strip that serves as a continent barrier. Europe and Asia have no natural border between them.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s anywhere between 2 and 7:

    • Afroeurasia (inc australia , antartica counts as an ocean)
    • Americas

    or

    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Oceania
    • Antartic
    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why is antarctica considered an ocean? It’s a land mass. Granted, the vast majority of it is covered in ice, but it is still above sea level.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s no way Australia counts as the same continent as Afroeurasia, and Antarctica is a landmass (unlike the Arctic ice). 4 continents minimum.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s between 3 and 500. Since it’s statistically unlikely that the correct number would be at either extreme, the most likely correct number of continents would be somewhere around 250, with a margin of error of approximately 245.

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    All you need is one nitwit arguing for a nonsense position for there to be “no agreement.”

    There are 7 continents. Anyone who disagrees is just soapboxing for clout.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      6, actually. Eurasia is one continent and it takes a lot of mental gymnastics to claim there are two separate continents there.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most countries that speak romance languages use a six-continent model that combines the Americas into a single continent called America.

      That would be a LOT of people soapboxing. Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, all countries in the Americas that are south of the US, and more.

      It tends to create confusion in cross-cultural conversations online because “America” does not mean the same place for everyone.

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The result might be an agreement that may not satisfy everyone completely, but indicates the overall concurrence of the group. – WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS

      What I’m saying is that one idiot disagreeing does not break consensus.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Continental crusts are an observable and measurable thing

      They contain higher concentrations of aluminum whereas you find higher concentrations of magnesium outside of those crusts.

      They are geological features and should be categorized accordingly. Eurasia makes way more sense than Europe being its own special thing… Except Europe, historically, likes to pretend the rest of the world doesn’t exist in their concepts and as such always considers itself special