That doesn’t sound better then the plans in the US. I currently get unlimited data for $15/month.

You can be concerned about a possible future issue and a current issue at the same time. To dismiss a possible issue because you are already concerned with something else seems silly. Maybe I’m misunderstanding what your getting at.

Not sure how you can believe on one hand that there isn’t potential for “thoughtcrime” but also recognize that the technology has a hard time differentiating between internal monologues and thoughts directed for others.

At best it just can’t recognize consent but at worst there will be a point where people can filter for internal thoughts. The more fine tuned this gets the easier it will become to abuse.

Granted I agree with you that the prospect of this being a nefarious technology doesn’t seem imminent and could also have huge upsides if used in good faith.

Lol look at this wankers post history

GOS is already working with an OEM to produce their own phone. I think they said they are around a year away.

Every year people have to re-find out /e/ calyx and lineage were never focused on privacy and or security.

Why even post this? do you really need outside validation every time you decide to give up?

Thanks for the clarification!

Its focused on both. The misconception people make is equating de-googling to privacy.

Great move. They should of done it weeks ago.

Yeah I realized. Dumb mistake.

Not trying to be rude but I am unclear of the purpose of this. Especially if they are not meant to be eventual replacements. If I already use Signal and OnionShare what am I doing with this info?

Yes. As long as GrapheneOS still exists there is at least some hope. The sad thing is even before this outside of GrapheneOS there really isn’t any other “ROM” actually focused on privacy.

deleted by creator

Considering what’s going on with Calyx these days I’m not sure I’d trust them either.

One is paywalled and one just gives me a blocked page.

Give it a try and update the post. If I was a betting man I’d bet it won’t work.

This is silly. You are either going to get in trouble or it simply won’t work. Most airports are going to force you to do facial recognition anyway when you go to show them your ID.

If your fingerprints don’t show up well enough they just won’t pass you for precheck. You don’t get to falsely claim its a condition and they go “oh OK”.

I don’t think people could have predicted how big of a need privacy and security would be on the internet or that the western world would so quickly embrace fascism / authoritarianism after barely a generation has past since WWII

I would just caution you to make sure the changes you make to Mullvad don’t change its fingerprint otherwise its kind of moot to use it over a privacy configured version of Firefox.