Democrats are currently leading Republicans in the RealClearPolling generic congressional average
A blue wave may not be as certain as some polls have predicted, experts warn ahead of Election Day, noting forecasts may be skewed because Trump supporters are notoriously difficult to reach, according to a report.
While current polls paint a positive picture for Democrats ahead of the midterms this November 3 ā some pollsters are questioning whether that number may be inflated due to supporters of President Donald Trump being difficult to reach by pollsters, Axios reported.
Polls previously underestimated Trumpās support during the presidential races in 2016, 2020 and 2024. Even though midterm polling is typically more accurate, some still underestimated Republican support in 2022, Scott Keeter, senior survey adviser at Pew Research Center, told Axios.
Progressive policies arenāt popular in the states.
Liberal ones are.
I guess that must be why progressive candidates pushed out a bunch of liberal incumbents in the primaries.
Yeah in New York and California.
Oh shit itās almost like voting in the fucking primaries actually fucking works despite the lemmy narrative.
Can you give me the top 5 most popular liberal policies?
Progressive taxation. Affordable Universal Healthcare. Public Infrastructure and Education. Reproductive rights for women. Voting rights. Providing a social safety net. Climate change. Regulating industrial pollution. Firearms regulation. Need any more?
The differences are in implementation, not in goals.
Take affordable universal health care for instance. The progressive position is Medicare for All. The Liberal position is taxing and regulating health insurance companies to force them to cover everyone, and force everyone to buy health insurance.
Got introduced legislation to back up your assertions here or we just making shit the fuck up?
And can you name some progressive policies That are being pushed but people arenāt receptive to?
Depends on how you define āpushedā and āpeopleā. There arenāt really enough progressive politicians to push any policies, and there are plenty of policies that have some support, but not widespread support. Granted, theyāre typically policies that would provide widespread benefit, but have been so twisted by propaganda that the people vote against their own interests.
āFreeā healthcare and college are good examples, where people are unreceptive because they overestimate the cost and underestimate the cost of the present system.
Which doesnāt mean those policies arenāt popular. Theyāve simply been propagandized to be āfairy talesā. The opposition canāt argue over the policy itself because the policy is popular so they have to argue around it. Thatās where you get these arguments that something is too expensive to implement or itās going to get exploited by āthe wrong peopleā and such. But it doesnāt make those policies unpopular. El-sayed is a great example because he runs on progressive policies and is very popular in his state. If the policies by nature were unpopular he wouldnāt be a popular candidate. Nobody gave a shit that Mike Rogers kept saying El-Sayeds policies are too expensive because El-Sayed cuts through that bullshit to keep people focused on what the policy actually is.
And if we go back to those popular āliberalā policies at least half of them are also progressive policies and some of them I wouldnāt even consider liberal, such as āPublic Infrastructure and Educationā. Modern American liberalism is against state socialism and state controlled public use of anything is technically state socialism. Liberals have simply adopted parts of progressive policies because theyāre so popular not adopting them would be stupid.
Popularity isnāt about anything other than the proportion of people in favor. If the majority of people believe the empty arguments around the policy, it will be unpopular.
The trickiest part of politics is dealing with the fact that people are mostly uninformed and uninterested, and grappling with the foolishness of the average citizen.
Which is why the popularity of a policy should be looked through the lens of do people actually support the idea behind the policy instead of what the policy is called. For example Medicare is viewed favorably among the republicans but when you turn around and start asking about government health coverage suddenly the support flips in the other way and republicans hate the idea. Except thatās pretty much what medicare is.
You canāt view popularity of a policy on a superficial level because on a superficial level the popularity swings whatever way depending on the very specific phrasing of the question. You have to get to the core of policy and then view the popularity of the core idea to understand the popularity of a policy. Because if the policy at its core is popular you can find support for it by cutting through the bullshit, but if the policy is unpopular no amount of cutting through the bullshit will get you support. You have to actually spin bullshit to make an unpopular policy popular and you can only do that when thereās nobody on the other side calling it out. Going back to the El-Sayed and Rogers example, the reason their debate was so one-sided is because El-Sayed was on the side of popular policies and could easily present them as they are. And Rogers couldnāt do anything because every time he tried to bullshit something he got called out.
Affordable lol. Yeah a very popular word. Without that word Universal Healthcare just tanks with the people doesnāt it? Gotta have it.
People love it when the things they need to live areā¦ with in reach [pause for massive applause]
Or even maybeā¦ realistically obtainable for most? [pause for wild deafening screams of adoration]