• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    this is why having google sign all the apps that can go on your android is a really bad idea and why we criticize apple for being a closed walled garden. please trust the nerds over the corporations bro.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The apps purpose is to aide illegals, break the law, and to incite/encourage political violence against law enforcement - the owner will find himself in a world of hurt the more he pushes this.

  • ryoshu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Rebrand it with the same tech as something like “Friend Sightings!” It’s not a 1A violation because Apple banned it, it is a 1A violation because the government made them ban it.

    • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Brings new meaning to Google’s decision to (effectively) block side loading on Android

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Back in the aughts I was an apple fanboy. Later they no longer had the edge but I won’t say it was completely not an option. Now it is completely not an option.

    • blave@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Wrong

      “Ownership“ doesn’t mean “I can do whatever I want with it”.

      edit: wow, Redditors are better at accepting the truth, lol

      • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 minutes ago

        Truth post. You don’t even have to enjoy the facts that you post. Lemmy is far too unhinged and emotional.

        If you state any fact they don’t like, you are downvoted.

        I lovingly embrace any and all ironic downvotes I will get.

        Seeth with me ❤️

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah if you thought Reddit was delusional about things like rights and ownership you’ve come to the wrong place lol. Lemmy and blue sky are the only places in the internet that can make some of Reddit look even slightly intelligent.

      • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        “Ownership” totally does mean it’s yours and you can do whatever you want with it.

        That means you can do it, not that you should, nor that what you do won’t have consequences.

        It just means your phone won’t stop you from downloading an unapproved app just like a gun won’t stop you from loading an unapproved bullet.

        It means your gun has a safety mechanism you can unlock to shoot, as does your phone to download “unverified” apps.

        It means you can sell either freely to someone else without it becoming bricked or the new owner losing any rights (lookin’ at you, Tesla cars).

        It means defaulting on the loan will require the physical reposession of your phone or gun, and that neither will magically lock you out of using it using telemetry.

        It means anyone with the right knowledge and tools can fix your phone and it’ll work, just like your gun.

        It means your phone works for you, and not for someone else - just like your gun.

        Your phone is a tool. Just like your gun. It can be used for good - and for bad.

        What you do with it is up to you, and not up to it or its manufacturer.

        It means you can shoot people with your gun, just as you can extort and blackmail people with your phone. Nothing, other than your own morality, the morals of society and therule of law are preventing you from doing bad things. Certainly not the will of the manufacturer.

        Any forensic inquiry into a phone on a crime scene would be like that of a gun.

        Any taking of your phone from your home or person would require a warrant - like with a gun.

        Any inquiry into your phone’s contents and qualities should require outside tools - like a similar inquiry into your gun.

        Your phone won’t have a special police-only history of what you’ve used it for - like your gun.

        Your phone won’t report what you’ve been doing with it to 3rd parties without your consent - like won’t your gun.

        And so on.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ownership of a phone doesn’t mean that the makers of said phone have to give you the source code and build in ways for you to be able to do things they don’t want.

          Your own the device that does what it was advertised as. That’s it.

          • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            “A phone’s schematics are publically available, like those of a gun”

            I can assure you, I’ve written no such thing in my original reply.

        • blave@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          you think people who own guns should be allowed to “do whatever they want” with them?

          how many mass shootings do we already have each week?

              • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                37
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Except we aren’t talking about the law. We are talking about corporations that sell you something and then retain control over it.

                You have no say in the process, you have no representation. These are not rules that we as a society have determined to be in the best interests of all of us. These are unilateral decisions placed upon us. You have no recourse if you disagree other than don’t use the thing.

                Guns don’t prevent you from doing anything. You still have the capability to do whatever you want with the thing. However, if you use it in a manner than harms someone else, in a way that we as a society have proposed, voted, and created laws prohibiting, then you deal with the consequences. But that is very different from having something in the gun that prevents it from taking ammo from another manufacturer. Or making it unable to shoot unless you pay a monthly fee.

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                Right, you can’t break the law. Gun manufacturers are very explicitly not responsible if you break the law with one of the items they manufactured.

                This is more like the gun manufacturer coming back two years after you bought it and preventing you from using bullets from a vendor they don’t approve of.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  No it’s not. When you buy a gun you’re not buying it with web connected software running it that is constantly updated and changed, and is actually a selling point, that you knew about when you bought it, and that you agreed to.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        20 hours ago

        edit: wow, Redditors are better at accepting the truth, lol

        So go pander to them.

        If I own something, I can do whatever I like with it because it’s mine.

        If I can’t do what I like, it’s not truly mine.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I love when newbie accounts think lemmy is reddit. Makes them easier to ignore.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    20 hours ago

    People are so stupid in this country. Do what the EU did and make it law that they have to offer sideloading and other app stores and payment methods.

    It should be the law to begin with. This walled garden shit is really just another word for controlling what the user does with the device they purchased and not allowing them to do business with anybody else exclusively to add software without apple’s approval and protection racket fee.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Everything is about control. The internet was left open by accident for a while and they are working hard to “fix” it. They are just trying to be slightly less obvious about it than China was. All of the forced AI tools, required apps and stuff like that are just ways to move users away from the open web.

      Once most users restrict their Internet usage to ONLY content provided by the large companies (for example, once people no longer click on any Google result), then Internet providers will start granting access to the content from large companies for free and charge a lot more for access to anything else.

      In 10, maybe 20 years, we will be needing to tell our internet providers when we change jobs so that they may change which “custom” internet services we get to have access to specifically for work.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It wouldn’t help.

      In this case, even if the app was side-loadable and had a web app, that’s enough of a technical hurdle to kill its critical mass.

      In other words, it doesn’t have to be banned; suppressing ICEBlock is basically enough to kill it.

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Arguably, if it was normal to sideload apps it wouldn’t be as much of a barrier to users, but they’ve been conditionned to think they need an app and the only place you can ever get them is the store.

        It’s a technical hurdle only because Apple decided they want to control everything, and same on Android because of Google’s ever increasing war on sideloading. You used to download an APK from the browser and it would go like “This is an app! Install?”, but now you have to go enable third party installation and all that, and now the whole Play Protect forcing developer validation coming up.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          You are overestimating how technical most folks are. I know kids and older adults, on either side of my age, that have no concept of a filesystem, a URL, an APK to download, things like that, because they’ve never needed any of that.

          Attention is finite.

          Hence, web app’s aren’t really blocked by iOS/Android, but that’s still a basically insurmountable hurdle simply because it’s not the usual procedure for operating a phone. Defaults and accessibility are king (and Apple/Google know it).

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      EU didn’t do anything except lower the tax on developers from 30% to 27%. And they still require Apple’s rubber stamp to install.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        They should have been concerned about OS lock-in, instead of app store lock-in. Imagine being able to install the OS of your choice on your phone.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The EU shouldn’t be concerned about any of that, because it’s none of their business tbh.

          If you want to install whatever OS you want on a phone, you’re free to go and make a phone and’s do just that. No governments should be able to force a company to do what you’re asking. It’s snaked to even suggest that Apple would shell out billions on hardware design etc and then be forced to give people a way to run AOSP on it and have it work.

          Do you people even hear yourself? Should Sony be forced to build a way for you to be able to install AppleTV on their TVs? Should Nintendo be forced to build functionality to let users install windows on the Switch 2, making drivers for everything etc?

  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Was there any reason to make this an ios app as opposed to a website hosted outside the US? I’m really not surprised by the removal. What did they expect? All the Tech CEOs came to the inauguration with bags of cash.

    • dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The only reason I can think of is the cost. Apple makes the map API free if you use Apple Maps on Apple devices. If you are building a website, you have to pay for Mapbox or Google Maps, etc., that can get pricey for indie developers.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Isn’t Open Street Map free?

        But anyway, these apps are all about accessibility to regular folks. Believe it or not many people don’t know how to bookmark a website. Also this app gives you notifications, something a website could only do via email or something.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yep, Strava doesn’t have any problems using OpenStreetMaps. No reason they couldn’t either.

    • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah good point. Plus if it’s a website you can use it in private mode and not have evidence that you were helping people evade the gestapo all over your phone.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Barrier to entry.

      Many (dare I say most) folks don’t know how to use a web browser, much less find a web app. Installing an App Store app is much easier.

      It’s also much lower visibility for those who do know.

      And that’s especially critical for this app, which relies on tons of people using it.

    • captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Building an iOS app is faster and simpler than building a web app. The developer also said he took advantage of some privacy features in the iOS development kit that made it easy to keep people anonymous.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        But Apple still knows you downloaded and used the app. Apple collects plenty of data on iOS, and their “privacy” marketing only applies to third party apps downloaded from the App Store.

  • GrantsGhost@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    21 hours ago

    With this and Google stopping side loading in Android, I’m going to be looking hard into Linux phones.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They’re not stopping it, they are planning to introduce it to the platform; no one sideloads on Android today, because it’s not a walled garden yet.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No one sideloads? Have you not heard of this niche indie game called Fornite that was removed from Google Play and Epic pushed sideloading means to install it?

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Could the EFF or individuals sponsor apps from devs who refuse to identify to Big Goog?

          Dev sends EFF the source code,

          EFF registers with Google,

          EFF submits the app,

          Everybody’s happy except a number of people for obvious reasons but at least the app’s verified

          • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            That sounds like just changing who is verifying the developer. Whether it’s the EFF (because they aren’t going to put their name and reputation at risk for unreviewed source code) or google, the issue is the same.

            Someone has to be the middle man in deciding what is allowed to be installed.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No one said it would be shut down, the thing all these clickbait articles leave out of the headline is “as we know it”, which means it will change significantly.

      • Tilgare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sorry, you’re well out of the loop on this one, boss. Sideloading has been common practice for thousands? millions? of users since the beginning of android. There are plenty of apps not listed on Google Play - the ones that come top mind are Fortnight for a time and now the Epic Games Store app, and some VPN apps that couldn’t offer features like ad/malware blocking in their Play store versions. Sideloading means downloading an executable install file (an .APK file in this case) rather than installing from Google Play. And they are SEVERELY limiting this ability next year.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t think people got your point. I assume you meant that people aren’t “sideloading” in android yet, because you just download an APK file and install it. Same as installing an EXE file in windows outside of the Microsoft Store is not called “sideloading” either.

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        All the apple fans out down voting today…

        FYI this may not be the time to take allegiance with them if you at all understand what is going on.

        • Kissaki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          I have a great dislike for Apple, and have never bought or used any of their products. I still downvoted the comment because it’s wrong (use doesn’t define general intelligence), toxic, and misguided (attacks those that we would prefer to change).

          You thinking downvotes are (mainly? fully?) apple fans speaks volumes.

          • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I just want to say I laughed at this.

            This is like claiming most people downvoting ICE might not be conservatives.

            Like, congrats if you’re being genuine… You’re like the Hispanic Trump voters. You think you’re doing something good, but you’re just helping the wrong side win.

            • Kissaki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 minutes ago

              What do you base this on?

              Lemmy seem quite heavily skewed towards non-apple users.

              What specifically makes me like a Hispanic Trump voter? Where’s the equivalence of self-sabotage?

              In what way do I help the wrong side win?

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          19 hours ago

          If you understand what is going on then you understand that, as of right now, all mobile users are thoroughly fucked. Google is about to gatekeep all Android app development and we don’t have any serious third options. The monopoly noose is tightening around the world’s neck.

          Apple, Google, they are both greedy, evil, abusive corporate oligarchs. “Apple bad” helps nobody. Google is just as bad. We need more options. Until Graphene works on non-Google devices, it’s not much of an alternative. Until UBPorts gets more support and adoption, it’s not much of an alternative either. We’re in a very bad place.

          • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Oh, let’s rewrite history, eh?

            Android allows sideloading for over two decades, but sure… BoTH sIdEs aRe thE sAmE.

            Let’s pretend Apple’s wild success isn’t to blame for this.

          • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I’m very well aware, but the apple folks tend to be a LOT more dogmatic and vocal. When people talk shit about android, nobody really cares. Do it to apple? Jfc.

            I am pointing this out because the current mess will never change for the better until apple users stop supporting apple. No, you dont have a lot of choices, but stop signaling support for them. Get mad and demand better. Be vocal about THAT.

            • Kissaki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              16 hours ago

              the current mess will never change for the better until apple users stop supporting apple

              And you think calling them unintelligent will get us there?