• IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    9 days ago

    To be fair, I don’t trust European companies with it either. As the saying goes: “Where there’s a trough, there will be pigs.” Want to keep your data safe? Keep it.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes, bit wary of these current trends that try to paint Europe as this holier than thou place where everyone only thinks about the polar bears and UBI, when the truth is we have plenty of capitalist sharks in our ranks that would be happy burning it all down for the next quarterly results.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        To be fair, we have the GDPR in Europe, which puts people at ease. However, this could be weakened or rid of entirely in order for the EU to become more “competitive” some day. Even the climate change goals of the EU has already been weakened so that we could catch up to the AI race. As sad as it is, it’s just the realpolitik influencing decisions.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          9 days ago

          The EU keeps coming within inches of voting for making secure encryption impossible. Chat Control would have been worse for privacy than anything the US has.

          • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Don’t pretend like Chat Control is ever going to get through.

            Each time they are going to vote it down, it gets retracted and changed slightly so they can try again. And every time it gets voted down again.

            Politicians know that they would get out-voted in the next election if they go through with it.

          • Attacker94@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Iirc they just passed something that enforced the opposite to chat control to stop the constant reintroduction of the same over reaching law

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          And every year new open mass surveillance worse than the UK and US attempts to be passed and barely fails.

          GDPR also doesn’t mean shit if it is barely enforced against large companies or the fines aren’t revenue-proportional… Then it is just a cost of doing business.

          • CAVOK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Let me assure you that in the large companies I’ve worked with, GDPR is taken very seriously.

            • jumjummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Unless you’re Facebook or any other social media giant. GDPR is just an minor tax on their profit.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Don’t kid yourselves. Once Europe develops its own big tech, it’s going to be just as untrustworthy. But at least it will be your untrustworthy.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 days ago

      For now, the EU has strong data protection laws that the US and China don’t have. Although it is true that stupid ideas like Chat Control keep popping up every couple of years.

      Ideally, though, you put them in countries close to the EU but not part of it, like Switzerland.

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s the EU trying to read everyone’s chat messages because .001% of the population might use the technology for sending CSAM.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s the EU trying to read everyone’s chat messages because .001% of the population might use the technology for sending CSAM.

        That’s only the excuse the politicians are using. In reality there’s a combination of intelligence services and datamining operations pushing for scanning ordinary law-abiding citizens communications.

    • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 days ago

      I honestly feel safer with my data in a foreign authorities hands than domestic.

      China can’t do dick to me nor should they want to. I’m just a lil guy! The US does nasty things to its citizens on the reg, I don’t wanna be caught up in that!

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        they can do plenty enough to be worried. maybe they can not harm you physically (for now), but by having access to details of the private lives of people, their conversations, and being able to see how they form their opinions, they can use that information to determine how can they reshape public opinion on topics of their interests. this information can be used by themselves, or they can pass it to an ally, and it could be used to change almost anything, like interfere with elections, or further erode the need for privacy so that people are willingly giving up even more data to them

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah just don’t travel to China. Imagine how awkward it’ll be in the airport when they tell you, “sorry, we have all your porn history and we don’t admit folks with poop fetishes.”

        • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’d like to think they’d be more accommodating.

          “Ahhh Mr. Albatross, we’ve seen your social media traffic and we’ve been expecting you! In anticipation of your arrival, we’ve prepared some lovely poop, if you would just step this way…”

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Europe tech often times are open source with commercial service.

      At least it’s better than whatever Google, Microsoft, or Tencent.

    • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Honestly, I prefer someone else’s untrustworthy.

      I don’t trust China at all, but I trust them over the US, if only because they have no stake in me as a foreigner.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          They are all in on renewables. The US want everyone on oil and coal, the US wants the junky to keep and dependency.

          We are the bad guys.

          • markko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            I don’t really see how that is relevant. Or how a country’s energy sources alone can determine whether they are “good” or “bad”.

              • markko@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                I don’t think it’s anything more than short-term versus long-term thinking.

                I would not describe either country as “good”, but that has nothing to do with the above statement.

                • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  The us focusing exclusively on the short term is what I like consider evil, and the stability of a long term-term focus is good.

  • shirasho@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 days ago

    I live in the US and I dont trust US companies with my data either. They either sell it or are handled by easily exploitable systems developed offshore in India.

    So, in that sense I do not trust the US, China, India, or Russia with my data and avoid software developed in any of these places when feasibly possible.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Even FOSS software? The Linux Foundation’s headquartered in the US.

      I do get the rationale, but honestly you could just change that to “proprietary software” and you’d have more options with just as much data security.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    I dont trust the US with my data … or anything. This place is run by literal idiots and/or criminals.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s amazing how many people cheer for corporations. There’s few consistents in the world but a big one is corporations are not your friend.

  • Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    But > 9/10 Europeans use whastapp / messenger for daily basis.

    9/10 european companies decide to use Aws, azure or gcp, instructions of Scaleway or ovh.

    9/10 europeans use Chatgpt or Claude instead of mistral or Lumo

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Of course.

        Personally I have given up on that. I try to either use false information when they don’t need the real data or throwaway" emails and SEPA and one time credit card numbers for banking stuff.

        I don’t trust any company with my data ever, so I’m constantly paranoid in a way.

      • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Okay but what’s the risk if the cccp will find out I can’t write a fucking yaml for the life of me?

        • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          They can hold it against you if they take over whatever country you are from.

          Your job chip implant will make you a delivery boy instead of a programmer.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Let me put things this way: after my last AliExpress purchase I was targetted for the first time in my life by a PayPal fishing phone call from India (starting with a pre-recorded message in my native language but then switching to some guy speaking English with an Indian accent).

          Somebody I know has been targetted twice by “you package is awaiting at customs” phishing messages after making purchases at AliExpress.

          Maybe coincidence, maybe AliExpress is having their trade payment processing ops outsourced to somebody that sells it to people that will use it to fraudulently pass themselves as a natural entity involved in the purchase process (like PayPal or the destination country’s Customs) or maybe AliExpress themselves sell that data. Judging by the amount of outright fraudulent sales claims there (the capacity of any power storage devices is at times hilarious, as is the output wattage of solar panels and storage capacity of external SSDs), my bet is the latter, though if it’s not that totally not giving a shit about the risk of the second possibility is almost a certainty.

          That kind of “why should I care” bullshit you’re peddling is exactly the same kind of bullshit that was peddled a decade and a half ago about having one’s e-mail with Google, and look at were we are now.

          Unless you’re stupidly isolated from it (not even giving them your e-mail), you’re going to leak stuff that can be used against you, even if only by criminals (and the authorities in China couldn’t give a rat’s arse about their people swindling or stealing from laowai).

          Like in the US, it’s going to be “Free Enterprise” abusing data about even if the local authorities don’t really care about you.

          • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            In this case, you use common sense and be suspicious of anyone with a foreign accent making unsolicited phone calls…especially those with Indian accents. The ones you should look out for are the scams that involve AI spoofing a family member’s voice.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              The less info about you is out there, the less handles they have to pass themselves for those who can legitimatelly ask money from you or which control access to your money, be they family, friends, your bank, the government and so on.

              They can’t spoof a family member’s voice if they don’t know who is your family or have access to samples of their voice - both things often obtainable via Facebook and would also be obtainable via a Chinese equivalent one might be tempted to use instead.

              Anyways, my point is that Chinese companies are inherently no more trustworthy than American ones, they’re just not as bad yet because they don’t yet have the same access to masses and masses of personal information for people all over the World - once they do, they’ll be just as bad because regulations in China are also shit and they don’t give a damn about foreigners.

          • Rooster326@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            The real question is why did you give your phone number to AlliExpress?

            Secondly, why answer an unknown number?

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              It’s used by the delivery people to contact me if they can’t find the delivery place or I’m not there. Also some of the local delivery companies will, for more expensive things, send the recipient an SMS with a code that you then give to the delivery person so that they know for sure they’re delivering to the right person (or somebody authorized by them).

              It’s actually a pretty good way to solve a lot of problems with delivery, but it does mean I need to have a mobile phone number which ends up in the hands of at least two entities.

              • bthest@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                You should just contact the carrier to give them your number after the order is placed. Preferably you could just include your actual number as instructions for the delivery driver (if they have that. ) Doing that cuts out even more middle men and your number isn’t officially logged.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  That would require for me to know which carrier would be doing the final leg of the delivery when the package is in my country, which often I don’t and over time there’s even new carriers popping up.

                  A much simpler solution is to have a second mobile number which I give out for these things which is actually quite easy since I can just use a Pay As You Go SIM.

                  Might be worth changing the number AliExpress has on archive for me, though by now if the sold or leaked that info, it can’t be undone.