It’s just an objective oberservation. No matter if someone tells me they have magical powers, have seen unicorns or believe in god: All of that is stupid and proves something is wrong with you.
You know that blood samples appearing where there are biological creatures around is not scientific evidence for a miracle right?
There’s a lot more needed to prove something scientifically.
But to get back to your question: I think a lot of the hate comes from (excluding the kiddy diddling) the exclusion of doubt. There’s a lot not yet explained in this world. And we as a society are at the point where everything unexplained doesn’t have to be explained to be “Devine” instead. There is so much knowledge we have collected as a species that makes a lot of biblical stories fantasy.
Religion probably was created as an explanation for the unexplained. We see this even more clearly in pagan religions, by them having a god for literally everything. But Christianity and other monotheistic religions are no exception.
Also religion was used to keep plebians in check. Rules were meant to be broken, but since breaking religious rules will have you burn for eternity, there is an incentive to do “right”.
Religion was also historically used as the basis for most wars. WW2 is one of the more extreme examples where people of certain religions were view as subhuman. And this is literally used again by Israel today.
it is literally human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive
dam it, who cut their heart out while it was still beating, and managed to keep the WBCs alive?
and no, “breaking rules” doesnt make you burn in hell, hell isnt even a fire, its the abyss. Jesus Christ died for our sins so we could be free of them IF we have faith. and the rapes were disgusting actions by certain priests that were defended by their diocese, not the Vatican
I mean if a holy item suddenly starts growing human cardiac tissue, its a miracle
and it was tested, and its human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive, meaning its not from.a cadaver
and if testing things isnt science, what is?
science by definition is using the scientific method to prove or disprove something
back to the 1800s “accuse them of insanity when they say something you didnt quite like” technique, I see?
It’s just an objective oberservation. No matter if someone tells me they have magical powers, have seen unicorns or believe in god: All of that is stupid and proves something is wrong with you.
God is real, there are a bunch of scientifically proven miracles…
Lol better claim that Nobel Prize then
Show me.
You know that blood samples appearing where there are biological creatures around is not scientific evidence for a miracle right?
There’s a lot more needed to prove something scientifically.
But to get back to your question: I think a lot of the hate comes from (excluding the kiddy diddling) the exclusion of doubt. There’s a lot not yet explained in this world. And we as a society are at the point where everything unexplained doesn’t have to be explained to be “Devine” instead. There is so much knowledge we have collected as a species that makes a lot of biblical stories fantasy.
Religion probably was created as an explanation for the unexplained. We see this even more clearly in pagan religions, by them having a god for literally everything. But Christianity and other monotheistic religions are no exception.
Also religion was used to keep plebians in check. Rules were meant to be broken, but since breaking religious rules will have you burn for eternity, there is an incentive to do “right”.
Religion was also historically used as the basis for most wars. WW2 is one of the more extreme examples where people of certain religions were view as subhuman. And this is literally used again by Israel today.
These are my reasons for not being theistic.
Christianity was persecuted by Rome in the early days, and for decades, and then by almost every other empire
it is literally human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive
dam it, who cut their heart out while it was still beating, and managed to keep the WBCs alive?
and no, “breaking rules” doesnt make you burn in hell, hell isnt even a fire, its the abyss. Jesus Christ died for our sins so we could be free of them IF we have faith. and the rapes were disgusting actions by certain priests that were defended by their diocese, not the Vatican
“Someone brought a sample of something” is not science.
I mean if a holy item suddenly starts growing human cardiac tissue, its a miracle and it was tested, and its human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive, meaning its not from.a cadaver
and if testing things isnt science, what is? science by definition is using the scientific method to prove or disprove something
It hasn’t been shown that that’s what happened though. What has been shown is that someone had a sample of something.
And even if a thing grew human tissue, that’s proof of that thing growing human tissue. It takes a LOT more to prove a deity exists.
the host grew ALIVE HUMAN Cardiac Tissue
that is literallly scientifically impossible unless…