some projects’ policies state that they would rather not have my patch because I used an LLM in the creation of it.
How much does this bother you? Enough to maintain a fork? It is quite interesting that people complain about this in place of doing what they are allowed to.
In this specific case? Yes, maintaining a private fork is straightforward. Yay git! We’re pinned to a specific version anyway for reasons.
It doesn’t bother me at all. That’s the joy of open source. I’ve got access to the source, I can fix bugs and add features if I want to. The project may not want my patches but I don’t need them to accept my patches in order to accomplish my goals. Like you said, it’s one of the things I’m allowed to do.
How much does this bother you? Enough to maintain a fork? It is quite interesting that people complain about this in place of doing what they are allowed to.
score 1 · canonical
In this specific case? Yes, maintaining a private fork is straightforward. Yay git! We’re pinned to a specific version anyway for reasons.
It doesn’t bother me at all. That’s the joy of open source. I’ve got access to the source, I can fix bugs and add features if I want to. The project may not want my patches but I don’t need them to accept my patches in order to accomplish my goals. Like you said, it’s one of the things I’m allowed to do.
score 1 · canonical