I emailed IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) earlier today to ask about the new content on example.com. To my surprise, their VP replied. Here is the email: I am happy to try and answer any questions you have. The changes we make to the site from time-to-time are usually informed by a desire to either reduce the overall bandwidth demands of serving the site, or improve its utility. At its heart it is a placeholder...
Fun fact: in the past I worked on Chrome’s bounce tracking mitigations, and we managed to generalize our detection algorithm to catch abuses of 204 responses that would silently set tracking cookies. (Did we actually see it happening in practice? I can’t remember. But there was definitely a privacy researcher who posted a POC)
Fun fact: in the past I worked on Chrome’s bounce tracking mitigations, and we managed to generalize our detection algorithm to catch abuses of 204 responses that would silently set tracking cookies. (Did we actually see it happening in practice? I can’t remember. But there was definitely a privacy researcher who posted a POC)
score 1 · canonical
oh cool I was wondering if that was going to get fixed
score 1 · canonical