• You can write quality software without LLMs. We’ve done it for decades, and we can still do it.

    An interesting thing I’ve been doing lately is point an LLM to code I wrote years ago that I put a lot of effort into, and give me feedback about how good it is and what’s broken. Generally the feedback is it’s quite good (things like differential randomized testing work very well!), but they consistently find issues I hadn’t thought about. I’ve never received a completely clean bill of health.


    score 1 · canonical