lobsters__novedevo@crustaceanson.theshelf.topM to Lobsters - all tags@crustaceanson.theshelf.topEnglish · 14 days ago[compilers, gleam] Gleam doesn't compile to Erlang source anymoregleam.runexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up10file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up10external-link[compilers, gleam] Gleam doesn't compile to Erlang source anymoregleam.runlobsters__novedevo@crustaceanson.theshelf.topM to Lobsters - all tags@crustaceanson.theshelf.topEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square10linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
minus-squarelobsters__mond@crustaceanson.theshelf.topMlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 days agoGleam is a cute and well-designed language, which I’d like to use if I had more time and a good use case. Unrelated question: How do gleam users feel about use expressions? https://tour.gleam.run/advanced-features/use/ score 1 · canonical
minus-squarelobsters__pkd@crustaceanson.theshelf.toplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 days agoNot a gleam user but this reminds me of Clojure’s threading macros. Clojure’s solution seems less confusing to me, but it might just be because of familiarity. score 1 · canonical
Gleam is a cute and well-designed language, which I’d like to use if I had more time and a good use case.
Unrelated question: How do gleam users feel about
useexpressions? https://tour.gleam.run/advanced-features/use/score 1 · canonical
Not a gleam user but this reminds me of Clojure’s threading macros. Clojure’s solution seems less confusing to me, but it might just be because of familiarity.
score 1 · canonical