Small technical note: GPLv2-only isn’t compatible with the AGPL; FairScan is GPLv3, so that isn’t the issue here.
The actual problem is attribution. It’s not a question of tone, it’s a question of license compliance: GPL code has to be declared, the copyright and license notices have to be kept, and any modifications have to be clearly marked and maybe dated.
What would makes OP happy?
Not the correct question. The question should be “How can they be compliant ?”.
Hi ploum,
Small technical note: GPLv2-only isn’t compatible with the AGPL; FairScan is GPLv3, so that isn’t the issue here.
The actual problem is attribution. It’s not a question of tone, it’s a question of license compliance: GPL code has to be declared, the copyright and license notices have to be kept, and any modifications have to be clearly marked and maybe dated.
Not the correct question. The question should be “How can they be compliant ?”.
score 1 · canonical