lobsters__janus@crustaceanson.theshelf.topM to Lobsters - all tags@crustaceanson.theshelf.topEnglish · 18 days ago[formalmethods, scala, video] Future of Programminglockwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square1linkfedilinkarrow-up11file-text
arrow-up11external-link[formalmethods, scala, video] Future of Programminglockwww.youtube.comlobsters__janus@crustaceanson.theshelf.topM to Lobsters - all tags@crustaceanson.theshelf.topEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square1linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelobsters__janus@crustaceanson.theshelf.topOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days ago 4:41: Reference to Peter Naur’s 1985 paper Programming as Theory Building 5:45: With AI, nobody has the theory, so the code is effectively legacy immediately after writing. 13:18: But with AI, we can also connect natural language to formal verification Demo of LemmaScript with Dafny 24:36: Presentation of Djinnlang paper, unambiguous specification with an LLM in the compiler 26:53: Mention of Guardians of the Agents, Formal verification of AI workflows 32:24: Instead of “code review”, we should review “coherence of the system” Nada Amin is a professor at Harvard SEAS. A research assistant at SEAS receives between $53k and $83k per year. score 1 · canonical
Nada Amin is a professor at Harvard SEAS. A research assistant at SEAS receives between $53k and $83k per year.
score 1 · canonical